DoujinStars
simonshen
simonshen

patreon


【國際關係深度評 🇺🇸🇮🇱🇵🇸】 特朗普的「二十點加沙和平方案」:內塔尼亞胡又是最大贏家

特朗普和以色列總理內塔尼亞胡會面後,提出「二十點加沙和平方案」,方案除了得到內塔尼亞胡同意,也有鄰近幾乎所有阿拉伯國家的背書,連近日對以色列加強施壓的歐洲國家同樣表態支持。哈瑪斯到了這個關頭,無論是否接受,都已經是最大輸家,這不得不說內塔尼亞胡的豪賭已經奏效。

究竟這一切是怎樣發生的?

內塔尼亞胡近月殺紅了眼,四出挑釁鄰國,又正在全力進攻哈瑪斯在加沙的最後據點,無視國際人道組織和歐洲國家的警告,很多評論都不知道他的算盤如何。但有了特朗普的二十點方案,一切就很清晰:哈瑪斯要麼選擇無條件投降,要麼內塔尼亞胡再激烈的軍事行動,都會得到美國支持。

兩者分別意味著甚麼?

要是哈瑪斯無條件投降,得到的是特朗普保證所有接受和平協議的哈瑪斯成員都會被特赦、可以安全離開加沙(以色列特工之後是否有行動則是另一回事)。但從此,哈瑪斯就會被名正言順排除在所有巴勒斯坦前途方案當中,而且這次可能不能再回到加沙,也就是失去一切根據地。如果哈瑪斯無條件投降,不但在巴勒斯坦人心目中「人設」崩壞,也默認了他們是加沙人民受苦的元兇,同時也承認了2023年恐襲以色列的策略全盤錯判。如果加沙重建真的出現,哈瑪斯滋長的土壤不再,外援伊朗也無力回天,這個「顯赫」一時的武裝組織,可能就這樣泡沫化。

但要是哈瑪斯拒絕投降,內塔尼亞胡擺明不惜代價強攻加沙的軍事行動,就會得到美國背書,雖然不等於會獲得阿拉伯和歐洲國家眼中的合法性,但起碼可以脫離近日的外交孤立。當出現重大人命傷亡,究竟是以色列的責任大些,還是拒絕投降的哈瑪斯責任大些,就可能變成是後者。而且當阿拉伯、歐洲國家表態支持特朗普方案,日後再批評以色列狂轟濫炸,也不能完全理直氣壯。

換句話說,內塔尼亞胡又成了最大贏家。

他和特朗普會面時,外媒還預言這是特朗普要和他攤牌,逼他只能在內閣的激進盟友、和美國這個最重要盟邦之中二擇其一。事後證明,世人實在低估了他。

事到如今,只要哈瑪斯拒絕投降,他繼續進攻加沙、乃至之後要兼併整個加沙地帶,都得到綠燈,這是求之不得。而要是哈瑪斯投降,以色列全部人質獲釋,內塔尼亞胡也可以向選民交代,加沙的哈瑪斯勢力還是被連根拔起,他同樣是解除以色列大患的民族英雄。特朗普的方案也得到以色列反對黨支持,內塔尼亞胡就有了和執政聯盟內激進派系討價還價的底氣。之前無論他有多少爭議、多少失誤,都可以一筆勾銷,甚至還可能連任下去。

如果你是哈瑪斯領導人,此刻又可以怎樣選擇?

【國際關係深度評 🇺🇸🇮🇱🇵🇸】 特朗普的「二十點加沙和平方案」:內塔尼亞胡又是最大贏家

Comments

剛宣佈停火了

堅離地書院 College

睇到這裡,感覺巴勒斯坦人的人命並不重要。疑惑巴勒斯坦人是真心擁護哈瑪斯,還是被逼?那麼世界各地支持巴勒斯坦人的示威又是為什麼?哈瑪斯應該不會投降吧。

Eric

多謝教授為大家撥開雲霧拆局, 知道點解內塔尼亞胡最近咁痴線

Cyrus Lee

Hamas' typical strategy: "yes, but..."

堅離地書院 College

I will push for an immediate recognition of Palestine state as condition to decommission if I am Hamas

TT

背後的邏輯可以嘗試拆解,是否涉及道德則各有各說法 😅

堅離地書院 College

多謝教授文章,令我想通支持以色列軍事行動背後的道德邏輯。

GBK

咁客觀上以色列封鎖加沙已經十年,而哈瑪斯用恐襲方式挑戰以色列又超過30年

堅離地書院 College

目前依然有其他激進組織(例如PIJ),問題是有沒有內部支持和外援

堅離地書院 College

Hamas is already split apart - those in Doha favor accepting the deal, whereas those in the front line prefer resisting till the end.

堅離地書院 College

Charlie Kirk在辯論時反駁問:在十月六日之前以色列有打壓加沙人民嗎?因此害死在加沙六萬多巴勒斯坦人的人是哈瑪斯。實事求是,哈瑪斯投降是應該的。第一,不要再害死在加沙的巴勒斯坦人;第二,「留得青山在、哪怕沒柴燒」;第三,願賭服輸,第四,就算死了也有真主賞賜。

AC

咁唔可以用第2個名再起?

Kin Lim

Palestinian sovereignty cannot gain global recognition at the expense of Israeli security, just as Israeli peace cannot be achieved by crushing Palestinian hopes through massacres. Striking a delicate balance between such a hard reality becomes more feasible without Hamas—a terrorist group that has never intended to offer a constructive path toward peaceful coexistence with Israel, and instead exploits its own people as human shields, weaponizing civilian casualties to provoke global condemnation of Israel and to galvanize radical anti-Zionist factions, particularly among far-left movements, into targeting Jewish communities worldwide. If Hamas is forced out of the picture, a win-win scenario becomes more attainable. The hatred and violence that have consumed generations may be set aside, at least temporarily, if economic incentives prove strong enough to outweigh the pull of vengeance. While the Trump-Netanyahu 20-point deal has garnered broad support from the West and key Arab states, it places Hamas in a precarious position, facing a historic crossroads: accept a deal that could immediately end the war, dismantle its power and influence, and perhaps merely push back its demise—postponing each martyr’s appointment to meet 72 virgins since, as Dr. Shen speculated, Israel’s Mossad may still pursue them abroad—or reject it outright, risking global isolation and accelerated military obliteration. If Hamas chooses to forfeit its claim to survival, Netanyahu will be vindicated: his old nemesis self-destructing well before the very same lip-service politicos and sanctimonious progressives attempt to cancel his own political career. In a bitter twist of irony, Hamas’s downfall may serve as Netanyahu’s redemption—be it political or strategic—and Trump’s remarkable achievement, while their critics dust off sneers for what they deem a futile plan, unaware the tide has already turned. The outcome remains unknown. As an outsider, however, nothing delights me more than watching people parade their ignorance and trumpet their self-righteousness.

George

如果今次真係解決到問題。咁回頭睇番呢幾十年兜兜轉擾擾攘攘的以巴紛爭,真係欲哭冇淚,好on居無謂。如今班中東富鄰兼歐洲遠富都爽爽快快say yes yes yes,說明佢地等咗類似的deal好耐了,等到望穿秋水,連沙漠𧫴餘的水都快抽乾,終於等到了

Dora YOUNG🍓

作為為一個不虔誠的書面教徒,我未去過以色列,我都好希望有生之年能坐郵輪去加沙,去以色列朝聖✝️

Dora YOUNG🍓

教授,您話Netanyahu(中文譯名大拗口了)豪賭,咁阿侵是否也更加豪賭?萬一哈瑪斯班PK咁唔趣真係拒絕,Netanyahu 當射飛彈如射水咁清洗太平地,無何避免死傷慘烈😰,咁阿侵不是更加被全宇宙剷到飛起?!一個人孭曬隻鑊?自由世界的猶太人更加心驚膽跳(曼城猶太會童近日又有有死傷的襲擊😰)。

Dora YOUNG🍓


More Creators