DoujinStars
simonshen
simonshen

patreon


【會員獨家影片・Simon會客室:宗教時刻 012 ⛪️✝️】 《彼岸的真相》作者、瀕死經驗研究者 John Burke 牧師:(二)科學與宗教對話:要怎樣的證據,才足以令「瀕死經驗」進入主流學術研究?(中文字幕)

《彼岸真相》 作者 John Burke 牧師談論「頻死經歷」(Near-Death Experiences, NDE) 的核心後續部份,我不斷提問怎樣才算是有公信力的學術研究,究竟宗教信仰、科學和神秘學之間有沒有界線,他認為自己的案例分析能否符合社會科學規範的方法論等等。這方面的討論可能比較學術,希望有興趣的朋友可以一同思考。

【會員獨家影片・Simon會客室:宗教時刻 012 ⛪️✝️】 《彼岸的真相》作者、瀕死經驗研究者 John Burke 牧師:(二)科學與宗教對話:要怎樣的證據,才足以令「瀕死經驗」進入主流學術研究?(中文字幕)

Comments

Usually we first fix the sample size and define the target population. It's difficult to do the other way round like him.

堅離地書院 College

Amen. I guess what I was trying to say was, I have my doubt on whether he is accurately quoting the research findings, and whether he is picking and choosing (which granted, happened a lot in science world as well)

Mark

現代科學定義的死亡之後,有沒有其他形式的存在、有沒有現在理解的知覺還是只是條件反射,一直有很多朋友研究。只是目前科學未能解釋,和需要以宗教解釋,兩者並不構成等號。

堅離地書院 College

If it's scientifically proven, it should have lead to sth. If not, there should be some notable fallacies. One way or another.

堅離地書院 College

I guess we're more interested in the methodology of the fact finding part, whether it's scientifically significant etc. Regarding religion, logical discussion doesn't help. 😅

堅離地書院 College

The 66 books all in sync are the most common argument Christian love to use, and it is not true at all! There are hundreds of discrepancies in Bible, and that's after all the amendments through out history by the church, nuff said! Plus in near death experience, there are tons of different phenomenon reported by people, and he is choosing only those fitting his theory. How about those who saw Allah? Or Buddha, or flying spaghetti monster, does it prove spaghetti monster is real?? You can read the lancet article he kept harping on, it said nothing about God, quite the contrary really. https://pimvanlommel.nl/en/consciousness-beyond-life/lancet-article/

Mark

欣賞這樣真誠的訪談, John Burke 牧師的對神學神蹟的研究很有心得, 而相對以科學角度來找尋神確實存在的有力證據其實比較難, 但科學有其極限, 不能證明不代表神沒有存在, 而人的本能智慧, 對神的領悟感應各有不同靈性的啟蒙, 當中沒有對與錯, 而愛心是人性的基奠, 也是通往神的聖殿的人生道路。

Elaine Yip

If you had 100 strands of evidence that point in the same direction, that is a strong case. That's something you can never prove by the scientific method.

Gary Xing


More Creators