VERITASEUM SEPT 2018 Briefing

Can we add decoy targets (with no relation to price objectives) to increase search space (possibilities) => filter false positives ?

It's being revisited this month.

Isn't this experiment a bit flawed since there was no target for Veri below $ 500 - which could veri well happen too, no?

When do you bring the Veri update?

I'm a little confused as to what I can access based on my subscription level... maybe there's a way to better organize this site so that it's more clear?

I agree- I'm new and was sold on the idea of getting premium content (vs standard YouTube clips) but I'

Yeah pretty pissed that I paid for the best membership and the content isn’t even available.

I just joined this Patreon page, but I'm having trouble finding what I thought was here. It's not clear to me at what level you need to be to watch certain things. Also, there doesn't seem to be much response from Daz or Dick or Rock to the few questions. Hmmm.

<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vF_7bunKWd0" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vF_7bunKWd0</a>

Hey CV team, the Farsight Institute are now looking at crypto through RV and made this video as a trailer to their BTC work, but he submits that the method you guys use isn't correct for this kind of work (please see the video link). Being new to all this, I am in no position to say anything either way, but what are your thoughts on what he is saying? Many thanks

yes when?

Does anyone know when the full conversation of Michael and duck will be out?

When will Veri be looked into again??

yes i agree, VERI needs a lot more looking into

and actually you have made public everything on the 20 dollar level so there is actually no point in this subscription at all. Can you please adjust your pricing and listen to your audience thanks

Hi Guys can you tell me when you will be retesting this veri target please. Please take on board what everyone has said about several more price options

This token might get a bump during the Indy 500 <a href="https://www.cnbc.com/video/2018/05/25/crypto-gaining-traction-at-indy-500.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">https://www.cnbc.com/video/2018/05/25/crypto-gaining-traction-at-indy-500.html</a>

VERI's patents and ICO go years back. Perhaps Michael could elaborate on the back story at some point.

sparella

Why does VERI have 98% of its coins not (NOT) in circulation? doesn't feel good to me. Dowsing uses the same source as applied kinesiology, which showed me Loopring (LRC), IPChain (IPC) out of all those listed on Huobi and Cryptopia. Also, I'm looking at PRO (PROPY), LANA, DBET, IQT. Would like you guys to consider these on your RV list..

Digibyte is going strong i see a lott more attention for digibyte these days. Maybe you should remote view the digibyte company and coin

I'll bring it up with the team. Thanks for the suggestion sir.

Many years ago i hired one of the old school military RV guys [JM] to do a job for me. For the number crunching part he used pendulum dowsing quite accurately. Might be something worth considering along with RV for this type of job.

Have you guys tried any back testing on a random crypto yet? i.e. price for ZEC on June 11, 2017. Would be interesting to see how accurate that is using RV.

Agreed and duly noted. This was done much earlier and we've taken the necessary steps to rectify this issue from reoccurring. Thank you for your recommendations. We appreciate all of you!

Could be bleedover. Could also be an issue with the exact phrasing of the target. Since "above 2500$" would also include "above 500$", both targets would be correct. Thats why one would usually set price ranges for each target, i.e. "between 500 and 2500" for the first one. Then it should be more clear. And there's also the question what happens IF VERI would trade below 500$, just in case. Simply: If none of target conditions is met due to VERI being below 500 for whatever reason, viewers might be drawn to the most closest condition or to anything else... So just for the sake of it, I'd also include a lower price-point. Assuming VERI will trade above 500$ @ September 1st, well it's exactly that. An assumption. And here's where RV opens up to methodical errors. Please stay away from those! ;)

This was an older target, we've modified the procedure and tasking since then. We get it. Thank you for your feedback.

We've modified that Ben since this was done. The Targets are now on separate pages. We expect this along with other modifications and suggestions will eliminate more bleed over between targets.

Feedback protocol: As an APP Pro, I take issue with the Feedback being on the same page. I have a 90%+ hit rate when I only see the correct picture until after the event - meaning, I never see the other options. I know that takes the entertainment value out of this, but I think people would rather you be right than entertaining. Can you at least put the different feedback pics in envelopes instead of the same sheet?................It could be done where the guys' sessions are shown, they just aren't allowed to look at the posted vids until afterwards...... AND, when I say I have a 90%+ hit rate, that rate is only from when I don't self-judge. When I self judge, my rate is only 73% (so far).

I was so hoping you guys would finally understand the target range problems that your audience has been politely telling you about but I guess you just aren’t going to get it. Each time I just scratch my head and cant believe you dont get it.

1. Have better range for targets such 0 to 100, 100 to 200, 200 to 500, 500 to 700, 700 to 1500, 1500 to 1btc. 2. Do theta next followed by populous and then digibyte. 3. Do more distinct pictures, such as bull, car, tropical island, moon, flag, bowl of soup. Not stuff that's so similar. Keep up the good work though! Veri sounds positive

Just watched that ted talk.... he said in the 80s they used RVing for Silver futures pricing and made 180K. Does any of the team know him? Can reach out to him to get his protocals?

Russel targ - <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?reload=9&amp;v=hBl0cwyn5GY" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">https://www.youtube.com/watch?reload=9&amp;v=hBl0cwyn5GY</a>

Great work, as usual, to the viewers. Dick: astounding, jaw-dropping results!

and theta

Any thoughts? <a href="https://twitter.com/cryptomanran/status/998788960888422400" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">https://twitter.com/cryptomanran/status/998788960888422400</a>

Yes. Let's hope the lesson is learnt from the mistake in target creation for in this experiment.

That's probably the only way VERI is going to be accepted. Sad to say the ones in power won't relinquish power and there is a HUGE power struggle going on behind the scenes.

This was tasked a few weeks ago so the price was higher at that point. We are going to revisit this token for greater detail.

I suggest Digibyte next. It seems to be a psychic favorite with Crypto Dragon, Sharon Michelle, Utsava, Cliff High and Michelle Whitedove picking it and putting it high on their list of predictions.

At $500 or "above" can also apply to the other two price target. The same for $2500 or above can apply to $10,000 price target.

Anything could happen in the crypto space, so a worst case scenario of over $500 for a token that is now under $90 seems a bit strange.

why does reggie give me the feel of a used car salesman? funny, clif and crew made fun of bitconnect when they said they have a trading bot that makes them money. right now, what is veri product? the vaeder, a trading bot. but they love this one lol. IDK, I dont see it. I asked reggie what the value proposition for veri was. he said unbiased research. so much for the tech i guess lol bizarre

There is no doubt that Clif High is a brilliant mind. I've personally learned a lot from him. I think for the most part he picked out some real winners in crypto and future events. Veri is very changeling to predict the outcome of. My personal opinion is that I don't trust Reggie and believe that the Veritasium platform is going to be a mechanism used to hide a lot of the stock market fraud of past decades. There is no way to confirm the outstanding shares and accounting of the major corporations. Its a giant mess. That said I do believe that Veri will have a very, very, bright future. The token count or amount of "shares" outstanding is what I need to know. I'd love to see Reggie airdrop the 98 million shares and have the market determine the price. In reality he will make back room deals with governments and financial institutions.

he does pick good coins. You guys are great, your skills no doubt are showing through, excited to see how the projects progress!

His words are not gospel by any means but we want to validate some data and continue focusing on these coins/tokens.

Keep in mind, Clif assumes his wins are based on wooo wooo..........but it is not alwasys.....his call of OMG going up 30000pct came out when it had just gone up 30000%......I don't believe in co-incidence, he misread that data..... ltc at 1/4 the price of btc, well, there is about 4 times the coins of LTC vs BTC so thats where that came from......point is, not all of clifs numbers are info from the future, some are just current data his bot picks up. I would guess most is. but hey, not trying to pick on clif, he can pick a winner and that is amazing. but I have lost alot of money trying to use his time and price forecasts.

oh yea throw it all out. At best he can pick a winnrer, not amounts, not time.

Clif High's had gold and silver prices along with his BTC predictions. Jsnip read one that was in the same paragraph. They were very high and not met.,

Jeff I think Cliff has been fairly accurate with his picks, but, as you say, the timing is off. Could that be because time doesn't really exist and we are always looking at things in a linear fashion? I would think it would make all of these woo woo-type predictions difficult to nail down to specific dates.

I am also quite excited to see Michael's report! That will be worth its weight in gold! - or cryptos - :)

Clif is not that accurate. He can often pick a winner, but he just cant pick prices and timing.....

I enjoyed the report. I wonder if, what George said above would help - having targets that are completely different from one another to minimize bleed-over. That said, I know nothing about RV so I don't know if this would be of any value. I DO like that the RV'ers collaborate afterwards and discuss whether the target should be narrowed in some way. Great information and I really like your style of research and open-mindedness!

Great RV Guys. Keep up the great work. :)

We looked at VERI to establish some levels. Clif H has said VERI will be in line with BTC. So we went out with this knowing that it will most likely perform well. We will start to fine tune the data as we are closer to SEPT.

Thanks for the session. I thought 500-2500-10K targets were too high and too far apart. At 90USD todays price the gains would be +5.5X, +28X and +110X. Statistically I don't believe there are many coins with this kind of performance especially in such a time frame, like 100 days, I would like to if there were any coin with similar market cap withthis performance. Veri total supply is 100M circulating supply is 2M. There can be 49X more VERI that has not been into the market which should dilute the price. If I was allowed to set targets I would choose 1)50-300USD 2)301-600USD 3)601-1000USD and 4)1001+. I would more set a target like this: If there are big or institutional investors now that are in the process of buying VERI as investment within 3 months, if their combined capital is 250M to 650M USD the target picture is A, if combined capitals is 650.001Mto to 1B target pic B, 1.001B to 3B target pic C, 3.0001B+ target pic D. I think this method looks at present and can be more accurate.

Feeling the same way. You have the remote viewing aspect down well, but again WHO is doing the tasking?

2nd target over $2500, 3rd target over $10000, OF COURSE you end up with bleed-over if it's over $10000! Also targets are too close together. Do an animal pic, inanimate object pic, and people pic with scenery in only 1 of the pics.

500 is veri possible by September but we want more :-)

ALT was about $480 on or around Jan 10th 2018, it it can get to that again (by Sept) that would be good

plus the fact that VERI is a digital asset that a lot of "old money" would prefer never really takes off ( funny how it's still not on any major exchange)

and yes only approx 2% ( 2 million) of the tokens are in circulation, what if anything is/will be happening to the rest could have a massive effect on the future price.

Hey Joe, VERI could be less than $500, that was an option they forgot to explore...

so in plain english 500? $ 700 1000? $ 2500 by september ?

Ed mentioned "with new imagery" meaning ... new targets. Also hopefully a new price breakdown or at least the addition of a 0 to $499 price point. I appreciate the want to keep the fields small and yet overlooking the idea that VERI could be less than $500 seems like (as Jeff Bloom) mentioned, a pretty big gaff. This could also be the cause of the discrepancies between viewings--what are the viewers to do with a "no hit" scenario? It's possible that you all (or the viewers individually) have internal images that come up for such a condition, that you all have discussed and are aware of internally (that we are unaware of) and that would be fine, but otherwise this seems like a poor protocol design. I know first hand how much effort goes into viewing and judging, and I appreciate you guys(!!!!) and I'd hate to see all the good/hard work derailed (or confused) by a poorly designed field. I'm excited to see the next round, I hope that it brings clarity, and as always, I think you guys are rockstars!

You guys are improving with every session. Targets were more differentiated in this one (a positive), but considering Veritaseum is less than $100 right now, it seems unreasonable to assume a starting point of $500. Perhaps you should address each reading in 2 sessions: 1st session establishes RANGE (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH), and 2nd session hones in on the price within that range. Overall I am enjoying this!

I was hoping for some insight on the timeline and distribution of the 98 million tokens currently on ice. Understanding that will lead to price prediction of Veritasium. Will Reggie sell them all to big corporations or will he air drop them into existing wallets holding tokens. This token overhang is the biggest question mark on Veri IMO. Veritasium is a business not a currency...what's going to happen with 98 million tokens on ice?

Check out the work of Marty Rosenblatt. He has used ARV to predict the stock market years ago with great success.

OK guys. I'm getting pretty disappointed here. I can not wrap my mind around how such experienced remote viewers such are yourselves are doing sessions with such BAD taskings. I still think the targets have too many similarities. But even worse, there was no option for a price lower than 500 USD? Really? The cryptomarket is extremely volatile EVERYTHING is possible. Also letting the remote viewer interpret his own results is a no no.

In my opinion it's a big mistake assuming that the price of Veri will be as high as 500.00. Your scattered results could be because there is no range for the under 500.00 mark.

thanks guys !!!

ahhh exactly. the most likely scenario is under 500, and there was no task for that (pretty huge gaff)

I have found putting a bit tighter tagging, putting the target in separate boxes with the target inside and labelled A, B,C,D and to say if this is accurate only describe this image only, when all targets are laid on one sheet like that I have found I often get bleed over between images

Typo: It says “Record/Publish Date: 7-17-2018”. That’s 2 months from now. (July 17th.) Was this video actually recorded on May 17th?

👍👍👍 I personally think trying to find price targets creates the needle in the haystack scenario. But targets like wall street acceptance approval. Or a coins demise because its a outsider would be easier to find. But everyone is so greedy they all want price range dates. Like I said they want to use remote viewing as a personal financial oracle. Good luck people. Universe will never let you have it that way. And if universe does there will be a heavy cost associated with it. Do you research and hold long term 5 years we all will be comfortable when the forced migration happens if you own your coins with private keys off all exchanges. And in personal wallets.

Great work guys!

Since &lt;500 would be 'none of the above', why wouldn't they just view none of the above in a loss situation? If they viewed energy and land, we'd know that none of the targets were contacted and a loss could be expected.

sparella

Exiting beginnings of this experiment,Finetuning and taking suggestions that could help the sessions and using it to zero in. And we all know negative comments will always be there but use them as motivation and help.

Another amateurisch tasking. People in all 3, metal objects of some size in two. And the value ranges are not only way out there (too high), there is no option for a LOSS situation which MUST be covered. Overall another worthless session considering the pro status of the participants. Unhappy customer!

perhaps an easier question/target would be about SEC approval? - that approval would make VERI fly

Nice work gentlemen. I am assuming the target dollar ranges are informed by Michael's research... Looking forward to seeing Jason's contribution.

sparella

Thank you guys for your interesting experiment.

Could it be possible that the bleeding over between targets indicate that none of the targets are hit? The mind could be wandering over all three, and pick one that the viewer, through his own expectations, seem most likely.The RV session seems to be Inconclusive as there is no clear consensus.

This tasking doesn't make any sense! The first target(s) should be "Veritaseum price at or below the present price" - in other words something like "Veritaseum price at or below 80 USD"! Please wake up and start doing something that makes sense... IF associative RV DOES make sense. Courtney Brown is not very convinced about that... ;-)