PATREON EXCLUSIVE: How Do High Quality Women Express Their Sexuality?

Good one !

Missionary can be really nice in love making, because it's very personal and intimate- I would be concerned if a woman NEVER wanted to do missionary, simply because it shows intimacy problems, that may extend to other parts of the relationship as well.

Rape fantasy usually comes from coping with being raped in the past, kind of like exposure therapy- it makes the past incident seem less scary, if you can make a fun time out of it instead, and CNC can be a very therapeutic thing for rape victims.

And if you were a hoe in past, stop it lol I've slept with 11 people total. I am 30- I've slept with 2 people in the past 8 years. That's a valuable change to acknowledge. Side note: freaky women are DEFINITELY high quality women lol nobody should have to live with vanilla their whole life 😂

Simple: don't be a hoe.

It is not about morality or naturality, it is about outcomes. If expression of sexuality does not hinder development and creates value (binds with partner) it is one of the high quality. Take same hypergamy example: it might advance entire species, select best genes, but in bad environment it will create disgenics, and fail to achieve goal (unrealistic expectations delay or deny womens ability to reproduce altogether). You may say low quality people might get to avoid consequences. It is mostly not true: even richest porn stars, actresses and other privileged people do pay heavily in long term for lifestyle..... Exceptions are rarer than rules.

Ignas

I support Alexander because he provides important and accurate information to men who are my sons' age, who are in a position to seek their first - and hopefully only - real romantic connection and need to be as well informed as possible to maximize potential and avoid foreseeable pitfalls. This is a good video for that audience. But for me personally, the subject matter of this video is moot. The "quality" of someone's sexual proclivities ceases to have meaning when they are no longer willing to have sex at all. age. It seems they burn out on sex, the fuel for the fire having all been spent. But the truly unfortunate thing is that it ceases for women decades before it ceases for men. We are left dangling and it is not a happy fate. Make hay while the sun shines, as they say, because winter will be here sooner than you realize.

You’re speaking of two very different things when comes to an evolutionary slant and a cultural slant to this. I don’t know of any evidence for promiscuity in a culture being sustained long enough to have an evolutionarily driven effect on women’s programming. It is true that some cultures have certain standards ingrained in them. Native American women will hardly ever dress provocatively exposing great amounts of skin and such. It’s exceedingly rare to find a Native American woman in any sort of pornography. In my experience, speaking as a white guy who has been embedded in a particular Native American tribe for over 15 years, there is plenty of promiscuity regardless of their notions of modesty.

Todd McDaniels

I’m not sure I agree that there are high quality women, just women, but I’m still sorting my thoughts out on this. Maybe it’s more about damaged and incapable of pair bonding vs. undamaged and capable of pair bonding. I agree with Alexander and others here that you determine that more by who she’s slept around with rather what type of sex she is into. The tricky little thing about that is that a guy never truly knows too much about that WHO because of the abundance available to women, so he has to infer from something in her behavior. And again, I agree that type of sex she is into is not going to be the measure of her ability to pair bond and such. There is a notion that floats around out there that men should benefit and therefore should desire a woman who is sexually experienced because that would bring more enjoyable high quality sex. The problem with that is women don’t bring any of that experience to the table. They still expect the man to lead, to have all the necessary experience. Whatever is deemed a failure is his failure. So nothing is really gained from a woman’s experience in most cases, unless she communicates well and that usually doesn’t happen, especially with sex. So, actually as I write this I’m leaning toward the idea of how well (how openly and directly) a woman communicates as being an indicator of her quality. The women here are precious for sorting these sorts of things out within committed relationships. I commend them and benefit from their reflections and insight. As a single guy, however, I am still looking for that predictive framework that will take me to the good communicators or at least filter out the bad.

Todd McDaniels

It is Ayn Rand xxx

Alisha

Hey who is aian rend ? Or someone know her name ?

I’m a romance novel junkie and read many many genres. It’s partly like initial research into what I might like or want try at home. 😉😆 So, I’ve read a lot of scenes with humiliation kink. I discovered it doesn’t turn me on personally (I just prefer more generalized dirty talk). That said, it doesn’t actually feel “humiliating” to me either. When I pictured myself in the scenes with my husband - I didn’t feel gross or degraded or legit humiliated at all. I could see how it could create connection and intimacy and demonstrate trust. It’s just that for me - it didn’t stir arousal per se. So I think I get what you mean by your comment.

I 100% agree with you Jen xxx

Alisha

I can’t help but believe that any man who thinks standard missionary sex is the best and doesn’t want to move beyond that…. is doomed. That said, I agree with you that it’s not necessarily about WHAT a woman likes sexually, it’s who she does it with. I’ve been married 20 years and over that time my husband and I have tried a heck of a lot of stuff. Some things we both love and keep doing, some he likes that I didn’t, some I like that he didn’t, and some neither of us really got in to. Our sex life runs the gamut of making love, having sex, getting kinky, and straight up fucking. Having a blend of all that helps keeps us connected, keeps it interesting, and keeps us both wanting more. As for some of the real hard core stuff… not the MO of our marriage, but from what I’ve read and heard a lot of the harder core sexual proclivities are grounded in a dark past. I agree with you that those pasts are not necessarily the fault of the person and that consenting sexual expression can be a healthy way of getting past and growing from that darkness. But sex is so critical to a healthy relationship- if one partner can’t get into MOST of the sexual activities their partner prefers… I don’t see that relationship lasting… not in a healthy way.

Tbh I think humiliation kink is different for men and women. I enjoy humiliation and it hard to explain but it just doesn't feel humiliating to me. It is just stimulating. Tbh I think it made me more secure because I am more chilled out when I started exploring xxx

Alisha

In my opinion I don't think a girl who is promiscuous in the past is more riskier than any other girl. People cheat for many reasons. Maybe there is some science behind what you say but I think things are very complex. However if that is just your dating preference then there is no judgement. You like what you like xxx

Alisha

Presuming that level of slut (promiscuity) shame is equal among all women is wrong. Women of different origin have different evolutionary (internal) and cultural (external) programing, making their level of promiscuity shame very different, as well as all other aspects of personality. You are presuming and applying same behavioral criteria to all women and cultures. That is imprecise for the very least. I am aware that this is not “pc correct”, but I am not interested in such “correctness”.